What is the challenge with defining universal human rights?
I think the challenge of this is that there is always an exception to every right. It is hard to define when and where there would need to be that kind of exception. There are so many rights that sound good in theory and then can blow up in your face. One problem with universal rights is that it allows other countries to come in to a different country and try to change it because they do not agree with their economic or political system. Other countries are begining to think they have the rigth to change countries because they do not have the system that they believe everyone should have, when honestly it is none of their business. If the people are happy, no one is trying to revolt, and no one is asking for help then it is wrong to intervine.
Why is this a human right?
If they want to intervine, no one can stopthem because it is their right to do so. Sometimes forcing rights onto someone is also taking away rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment